An IFSAR Quality Management System16/03/2005 |
| Meeting DEM and Ortho-imagery Specifications |
| Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (IFSAR) is emerging as a highly cost-effective 3D mapping technology. Digital elevation models and ortho-rectified radar imagery are core commercial Intermap Technologies products using its airborne IFSAR based STAR technology, the list of applications for which is continually growing. Quality control and assurance ensure consistent data quality. |
| Xiaopeng Li, Garth Lawrence and Thomas Hutt, Intermap Technologies Corp., Canada |
|
Data quality has become a matter of escalating interest amongst the geospatial community. Data providers must thus ensure their data products meet specifications; quality must be built into the production process so that data consistently and predictably meets expectations. A rigorous Quality Management System (QMS) needs to be designed and implemented in the ‘data factory’, implying that a series of Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC/QA) be conducted along the whole production chain. A QMS tactically integrates various QC/ QA tasks to facilitate production whilst maintaining productivity. As a producer of geospatial data, Intermap has been paying ever-increasing attention to the quality of its data products and the customers who use this data. A QMS has been established and dedicated to facilitating quality handling and continuous process and quality improvement at Intermap.
Quality Components of STAR Mapping Spatial accuracy is the most important quality component, which includes relative and absolute accuracy as well as the accuracy uniformity of the products across the mission area. Another component is completeness. Datasets shall cover to mission boundary, with missing objects and data voids being properly handled. Logical consistency is crucial; multiple products DSM, DTM, ORI etc. for the same area shall be logically consistent, including co-registration, edge matching between adjacent map sheets, reasonably flattened water bodies, drainage monotonicity and continuity, DTM lower than or the same as DSM, etc. Cleanliness of artefacts pays close attention to antenna patterns and range effects, spikes and wells, de-correlation, seam lines, and motion ripples, which might be caused by the nature of the radar sensor, environmental influences or interaction of radar and ground features. And concerning the physical format, intermediate and final products delivered to clients shall have the required format. Adaption to Practice Our QMS requires that all processes be documented so that everyone involved in the process follows the same instructions. Quality means producing the same product the same way all the time. If the process is found not to be contiguous with practice, designated personnel are tasked to determine which is right. If the practice is found not to be correct then retraining is required. If the practice proves a new and better way, then the process document is rewritten and improved to take advantage of the new process. A net benefit of this scheme is continuous process improvement. Further, the concept of process ownership has greatly increased staff quality awareness in both technical and management aspects. The commitment of process ownership has also improved non-conformance resolution with the goal of enhanced productivity through reduced rework. Treating the next process as an internal customer helps ensure that data going to the next process meets the particular specifications of that stage. This will re-sult in an early catching of potential quality problems and their early elimination, thus reducing amounts of rework.To ensure a product meets its specifications, QC/QA shall be strategically integrated into the production process, facilitated by a QMS and supported by a set of consistent standards. In the context of this article, QC refers to a series of technical activities for in-process detection and correction of defects at each transformational step of the production chain. QA includes the inspection and testing of data products, both intermediate and final, with respect to the specifications to ensure they are met. QC/QA Tasks The mission planning QC/QA ensures correct and efficient planning of the mission. Usually, a certain number of redundant across and overlapping flight strips are also planned and acquired for the subsequent QC/ QA. Data acquisition QC/QA signifies that rigorous system maintenance and calibration are regularly conducted to ensure stability and functionality of the radar system. The quality of all collected data is checked and assured. Data processing QC/QA includes the following three sub-tasks. First, the Navigation QC/ QA is meant to control the performance of the navigation system. Secondly, the Motion QC/QA is to provide a first-order prediction of artefacts; and thirdly the Auxiliary QC/QA is to evaluate consistency and accuracy of available auxiliary data. The interactive editing QC/QA is to detect and correct potential blunders inherent to the datasets and is comprehensively conducted for every single mapsheet. Value-adding QC/QA is application dependent and is tailored to meet specific user requirements. And finally, at the end of all processes, there is the Delivery QC/QA. Independent Assessment At Intermap, a series of Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) steps are also conducted. Whilst the process-QC/QA steps are focused on specific points within a process, i.e. looking at the ‘trees’, IV&V tasks look at overall data quality, the ‘forest’, through tools and processes different from those used in production. IV&V employ a combination of full-inspection and data-sampling techniques to ensure quality. IV&V is designed and implemented to ensure that a particular dataset, product and process are performing as expected. IV&V do not replace the above-described process-QC/QA, that takes immediate responsibility and is conducted in a more comprehensive way for the whole dataset. |
| Biography of the Author(s) Dr Xiaopeng Li is an American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS)-certified Photogrammetrist. He holds a PhD in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing from the University of New Brunswick, Canada and has been working for Intermap Technologies Corp. as a mapping scientist since 1999. Garth Lawrence is vice-president (customer care) at Intermap. Mr Lawrence has 31 years international experience in remote sensing and geomatics, including in satellite and airborne sensors and services. He has been with Intermap and predecessor companies since 1981. Thomas Hutt is manager of the Independent Verification and Validation Department at Intermap Technologies. He graduated from Algonquin College (Canada) and has been working in photogrammetry since 1973. He received a Photogrammetric Certificate of Registration from the Ontario Land Surveyors, Canada in 1991. |

